However, bear in mind that the difference in price is a major contributing factor to why I prefer the FX6 over the Eheim 2262. Overall, it’s difficult not to declare the FX6 the clear winner in this bracket. Whereas, Fluval’s FX6 features a concentric design where the water flows through an outer circle of mechanical filtration (foam) and then enters an inner circle housing the biological filter media before, naturally, being returned to the aquarium. it enters in the bottom and exits the top. The Eheim 2262 is more of a traditional linear canister filter i.e. The way the FX6 and the 2262 work is slightly different, and in an interesting way. Well, simply put, the impeller turns and water is sucked out of the aquarium and pumped back into the aquarium. Fluval FX6 Vs Eheim 2262: How Do They Work? you have a totally open bucket-style space to configure with media exactly how you’d like. Sure, the FX6 creates directed flow and easier maintenance, but the 2262 offers total customizability, i.e. This isn’t necessarily an inferior setup, as it depends what you, the user, are looking for.
While the FX has media trays that create concentric circles, the Eheim 2262 has very simple and thin separators to divide different types of media. The first noteworthy feature on the FX6 is the drain, which allows you to attach a hose, open a valve, and easily drain the canister of water.Īgain, similar to the FX6, the Eheim 2262 features a drain which allows the user to empty the filter making it lighter and maintenance easier. Fluval FX6 Vs Eheim 2262: FeaturesĬonsidering the fact that flow rate and canister size are comparable, perhaps the different features of the two filters might help you decide. However, as I say, prices change all the time, so check the current prices on Amazon right now. So, for two products with a similar media volume and flow rate, the significant difference in price is a big win for the Fluval FX6. Right now, on (affiliate link), the FX6 is priced at around $330 whereas the Eheim 2262 is $430. But, at the time of writing this piece, the FX6 is the less expensive product. Fluval FX6 Vs Eheim 2262: PriceĬomparing price represents a challenge, because there are often sales and price changes. While some users may prefer to have a larger customizable area, the FX6 does dedicate its central section to your biological filter media of choice. However, the FX6 has a unique concentric design where a large portion of the media capacity is required to be taken up by foams. This is because Eheim’s 2262 houses 4.75 US gallons of filter media, whereas, the Fluval FX6 can take up to 5.28 US gallons of filter media. However, if we have to pick a winner, then it’s the Fluval filter again. Similar to flow rate, the media capacity for the FX6 and the 2262 are almost the same. Whereas, Fluval’s filter-the FX6-shades it at 925 US gallons per hour. Eheim report their 2262 as having a flow rate of around 900 US gallons per hour. the power of the pump, the FX6 and the 2262 are pretty comparable.
Large canister filters, the Fluval FX6 and the Eheim 2262 are the twoīest. On, in this case, getting the best filter available. Nobody among us wants to lose a fish because we skimped The reason why we want the best of the best when it comes toĮquipment. Fluval FX6 vs Eheim 2262-which is the best?įish, and we have extra love for our own fish especially.
0 kommentar(er)
